To upgrade to the non-adaptive version of the website
Demonika in group published beauty Secrets

That it is better: tooth-powder or toothpaste?

Что лучше: зубной порошок или зубная паста?
I think what people of advanced age remember how in the period of Soviet period on shelves of shops there was a scanty amount of hygienic care products for teeth. I from there, from that time therefore well I remember round boxes with tooth-powders which stood on shelves of shops and in the bathroom. And I remember paste in metal tubas, but it was a little and for me it was "tasteless". I remember frequent at us Pomorin and the nursery - "Cheburashka". "Tasty" paste was deficiency and it was brought from Moscow and from abroad. By the way, paste in the Soviet Union is manufactured not so long ago, approximately from 56th year. Too there were a few tooth-powders, I remember three: "Special", "Children's" and "Mint". In cardboard boxes. Were also in tin earlier, but I then was not yet, and from powders were stored in tin boxes at mothers and grandmothers of a needle and pin. Do you remember?


Tooth-powder was everyday life, paste - special chic: it was more beautifully, and more expensively... And, of course, the more became types of toothpaste, the less there was tooth-powder population. And soon there came the period when "awful" cardboard boxes were gone from shops. Shops captivated pastes and there was no wish to return to "sovok" powders somehow: they are still considered as many as plebeian option, low-demanded, and therefore it was only possible to find in its shops "in the afternoon with fire"...


And so was until recently. And since recent time the people began to think of the health strongly. Also it turned out that powders were not so bad. Moreover - they, it is are remarkable and have such properties which are not in pastes habitual to us. And now at powders new take-off is observed, and producers have an inflow of the creative ideas on their production. In shops still not such a wide choice and the price of powder sometimes bites, but it is, and continues to appear that cannot but please. And now, there is a little ponostalgirovav, I would like to argue a little on a subject: what to prefer for health of teeth, powder or nevertheless paste and in what their main difference.

As an example, I will take well me familiar and gently favourite powder from the Herbarica series Beauty Secret brand. I already wrote about this powder here - www.wowcharm.us/kosmetika/obzory/belosnezhnaya-ulybka-i-zdorovye-zuby-s-herbarica/, and now I suggest to look at all this from other foreshortening.


Earlier, as a part of powder "abrasive skrabovaya" the weight which had to clean teeth reliably surely contained: chalk, the pulverized sinks of mollusks, an egg shell... Somehow antediluvian and terribly all this sounds because theoretically not only it has to is good to clean, but also remarkably to scratch enamel of teeth. In modern powders everything is not so terrible, on the contrary - is much softer and is many times more substantial. In my powder "Bleaching" in structure": calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium, chlorine, iron, kaolin (white clay), hop cones, leaves of currant and coltsfoot, violet three-colored and sage, fruits of a mountain ash and peppermint, nettle and St. John's wort, roots of a licorice and radio-gramophone pink, St. John's wort, thyme, sea salt, baking soda, celandine, essential oil of a tea tree, birch ashes... it is a lot of? But structure tremendous! Any chemistry, completely natural ingredients! Did you see at least one toothpaste with such structure? I - am not present! Any abrasives! Cleaning happens carefully and shchadyashche, and the natural structure feeds, treats, keeps, prevents... The grasses crushed in powder do not damage enamel at all. In the same series there are also grass powders. To use a little problemny, than just to squeeze out paste: powder needs to be turned into gruel, previously having wetted.


Gerbarika has a measured spoon which is recommended to measure powder, and then to dilute with water to gruel. Lazy act simpler: dip well humidified brush into powder. In principle, as option - too it is quite good, so far there is a lot of powder: the bubble is similar to pharmaceutical from vitamins, quite deep. Powder very gentle, easily absorbs moisture therefore the lid needs to be closed densely after use. There are no such problems in paste But, to be fair is such a problem? But here powder is more expensive, it yes, especially good powder. But it and much more naturally and more substantially, unless is not present? Many are ready to pay for it now. And if the product also really helps... By the way, at "Beauty secret" very interesting line of tooth-powders, small, but very substantial to whom it is interesting - you can examine, I assure - you will not be disappointed.
Cheap powders too on sale come across, those, it is from the childhood.

Many experts in the field of hygiene of teeth actively argue on a subject: what after all powder or paste are better? As I already told, powder is more substantial, more naturally and more carefully as consider many, belongs to teeth, does not contain artificial components and preservatives. Paste is more convenient in use, the tube is tight and does not start up in itself harmful bacteria while powder is less durable and often there is no batcher spoon. Sensitive enamel of teeth even to the smallest grinding of powder nevertheless belongs worse, than to paste, it should be considered. Paste does antimicrobial processing of an oral cavity nevertheless better. The Russian people are resourceful, and some try to kill two hares, mixing powder with paste and assure that one strengthens another and result tremendous. Disputable, but takes place to be. It is still important that paste is good to use daily, and powder is better courses. Some powders can use and once in three days while paste - 2 times a day are desirable. So when using any of means it is desirable to study the instruction, and ideally - to consult with the stomatologist. And still, as all toothpastes of very long storage, at each of them there is a sodium laurylsulphate - very harmful compound of accumulative action which is not brought out of an organism, but it carefully cleans teeth and also washes cars not less carefully, being one of the singing means making chemical for car washes and large enterprises. And triklozan, killing to death bacteria? Its smallest particles, certainly are swallowed also it with the same goodness and assiduity slowly the stomach kills.

I sum up the result, and that it is possible to talk profusely infinitely: tooth-powder - practically the same paste, only in a dry form. Both substantial paste and powder rich with a plot - are good in own way. Minuses are both there and there. To choose to you. On taste and color - you know... And I nevertheless, likely, incline to powder... And you?

I hope that my opus will appear to you though it is a little useful. Let your teeth will is dazzling beautiful!
 
And what is chosen by you? Let's vote?



Copy the code and insert into a window of creation of record on LiveInternet, previously having included the Source mode there.
HTML-code:
The BB code for forums:

How will it look?
wowcharm.us That it is better: tooth-powder or toothpaste?
  I think what people of advanced age remember how in the period of Soviet period on shelves of shops there was a scanty amount of hygienic care products for teeth. I from there, from that time therefore well I remember round boxes with tooth-powders which stood on shelves of shops and in the bathroom. And I remember paste in metal tubas, but it was a little and for me it was "tasteless"... Read more:

"Byyuti-podushka for prevention of wrinkles | The Korean strips of Etude Organix – we clean and we narrow pores in 10 minutes"


You look also:
I present to your attention a natural BOMB FOR the BATHTUB "orange cinnamon", from all of the known SIBERINA brand.
Never earlier, I used such cosmetics though heard much. So for me this new acquaintance... To read further"

All reviews of cosmetics