
As small derogation from a subject, here it is interesting to me how the ordinary Siberian grandmother made recipes of plants which at all never grew in Siberia?
I explain small volume only with the idea of the line. Type, it a la a pharmaceutical product, and therefore a packing as at medicine.

But only 300 ml of shampoo – it are even good. To try several times. And if something does not approach, then it is possible to say goodbye to ease because not a lot of product will be gone in vain.
At all any shampoo should have no cover such! This neck very wide, and structure liquid, also pours out shampoo a huge dose, spills by a palm, generally – is not economical. Why did not make the batcher?


Properties of shampoo
I liked aroma. It is very clean, pleasant. It is similar to aromas of Nivea or Fa conditioners. It is more similar to a smell of a cosmetic product, than to broths and herbs.Color too excellent. Earlier it was one of my claims to Agafya. All products have a little unpleasant color some too natural. And here – unexpected opening. Color and slightly nacreous texture of dermatological shampoo – very lovely, modern.

If to speak about texture, then I noticed that all Agafyevskiye structures – some rubber perhaps. On hands and at application and washing off the viscosity is felt. As though kissel in structure. It is not pleasant to me. And here – the same. Externally texture excellent, modern, and in practice – again this kissel. Interestingly even, what is it? Too much some emulsifier is put? It is impossible to determine it by structure, unfortunately.

Structure
High on the list – sulfate, salts, polymers – anything special. Everything, than the brand is proud, - at the end of the list.
Namely: the promised soap root, flax oil, extract of a root of an acorus and a keratin – all this in the very best end, after fragrance (parfume).
Was interested I this phrase.

It is interesting what tests, and what results were? Probably, it is possible to ask this question in PR service of the brand. Though I do not believe that I will be answered. I wrote letters to different PR managers of cosmetic firms much earlier. Spam mailing of the releases to my address was the answer, as a rule, and they do not enter real dialogue with journalists.
And what hair?
Yes, we forgot about them while I described external properties of a product.In practice shampoo Dermatological from "Agafya's First-aid kit" showed good foam – is soaped easily and shaken up without any efforts even with a small amount of water. But on hands this kissel is felt! I can do nothing, I feel it!
I did not begin to use the conditioner to understand what specifically for hair does this shampoo. It appeared, as without conditioner hair well finish, comb hair without difficulties.
Feelings on head skin – good. Skin "breathes", some even simplification is felt. Skin does not dry, there is no tightness – the truth, some release directly happens! And the light aroma keeps – it very thin and clean.
To the touch hair soft, mobile at roots. There is some volume. And the ends – a little hardish. That is, it is desirable to use the conditioner. Dermatological shampoo – not a product of "wash & go". My ends weakened by coloring, and they need Konti. It is possible if the ends in good condition initially, then conditioner is not required – it is necessary to check individually.

Shampoo does not give gloss, special silkiness too, and it is one more reason why balm or the conditioner is necessary.
My verdict is a pleasant shampoo. And I would continue to buy it if not several shortcomings about which I wrote above:
- "kiselny" consistence, unpleasant for me, it is felt even at such nacre.
- an inconvenient can which of wide neck everything pours out uneconomically.