Packing promises quality of a professional tool of leaving. The name of the brand reminds a name of the known brand for hair of Londa. Interestingly, it is accidental or intentionally? It would not be desirable to face a blende.
The design is made with a claim for expensive means too though this balm available at the price.
The abundance of various logos and badges on packing calmed a little. Here what is here:
- ISO. Number specified on packing is not found in the list of the quality standards of cosmetics. This standard does not belong to cosmetic products. It concerns standards of management of the company, and the car or bank can have the same badge. But the fact that the company runs the business on standards – is already pleasant.
- EAC is the badge designating that the products are on sale in Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus.
- Arrows in a triangle. It is the good sign, it says that packing from the processed plastic. But, unfortunately, it is the voluntary sign, it is standardized by nobody and not checked, it can be put just "for appearance".
- Trekhlistnik in a circle is a sign of the Ukrainian standard, as Rosstandart. Then the question – why is not present a badge of Rosstandart?
Generally, there was a strong wish to see "a thick and magnificent hair" which has to appear "in 1 minute".
Let's consider all promises which packing makes:
Promise 1: It is easily distributed on all length of hair.
It is the truth, structure pliable, not too dense and uniform. Pleasant and snow-white, as at Elsève balms.
But here what was not pleasant categorically – so it is a smell. The fragrance is available in structure, but it does not suit me at all, or here it very little. Balm not really pleasantly – some old-womanish soap smells. There was at Yves Rocher such hand cream "Biot's Oats" few years ago (here I had packing, I did not use and I am going to throw out all) …
… this cream smells one - in - one as this balm. I am cream this did not use because of a smell. I still can bear it, and here the husband abused, it was not pleasant to it. And now here one more test with similar aroma – this conditioner. Pleases only the fact that it very quickly disappears, and on hair it is not felt. But means smells quite so – old-fashioned cosmetics!
Promise 2: Moistens hair without weighting.
About moistening it is possible to agree. As a part of really many the moisturizing ingredients. As active ingredients these two are declared: oil argon and vitamin F. These are the good feeding and moistening components. But, having studied structure, saw two more useful humidifiers: extract of almonds and glycerin.
There is no weighting it seems. By the end of day hair did not become fat. Means, this promise is kept!
Promise 3: Feeds hair with useful minerals of natural components.
Yes, the vitamin structure is available. But, in fact, it is the same humidifiers (oils and vitamins).
Promise 4: Provides oxygen saturation and volume from the roots.
Here is how to check it? I mean oxygen saturation. Means, I will estimate volume. It had to appear after the first application. Some splendor, really appeared. But not at roots. More likely, on tips and on the center of length. Yes, hair became soft, not confused, were a little smoothed it seems. But roots have no volume. Frankly speaking, I also did not wait especially, as a part of many oils, fatty acids, there is also an alcohol. And something is not believed that these usual substances will make volume on all length. The appeared volume is closer to the middle of a hair and on the ends it is possible to call splendor more likely. But it is, I will not deny.
Promise 5: The unique combination of vitamin F and argon oil adds to hair healthy gloss and returns them vital force.
My hair really lack forces and gloss. Therefore it seems as I am the most suitable client for this means. What do we receive after application? Here so hair looked before washing (they a little dirty here).
And here so - after washing with shampoo and use of balm:
I did not notice any super gloss. But hair to the touch became more pleasant. And even soft. And a little more magnificent. It is not extra gloss, and not an ektr volume. I see a difference, but will not call it cardinal.
It is necessary to think, probably, of the food and a way of life, otherwise you will not receive gloss and density for hair. And balm one does not cope with it. At least, this balm.
In general, means has positive sides. It was pleasant to me that there is no weighting and the splendor appeared. Roots have no volume. Pleasant comb hair easily, to the touch.
