I do not know how you, but I was always positive to means of "The clean line": they please with the low price and high quality. But shampoo which I used at parents, caused in me extreme indignation. And this first means from "The clean line" of which I complain. Also I want to tell about it.
I present you "Clever normal hair and head skin shampoo" from ekhinatsey and broth of bark of an oak. Shampoo goes in a transparent plastic bottle, style, issued in uniform for means of this brand. The bottle quite attractive and all description speaks about a large number of natural components in structure.
Bottle cover too usual for the Clean Line brand. It is convenient to open and close it, nothing spills.
From a reverse side of a bottle explain to us why shampoo "clever". The producer assures that he acts directionally against the main reasons for a hair loss.:
"improves blood circulation;Attractively, isn't it?
strengthens weak roots of hair;
struggles with fragility and section of hair, condenses them".
The product underwent the necessary certification – EAS and the state certification of Ukraine. After opening it can be used within a year. The volume of this bottle – 250 ml. But happens more.
As a part of really many plant extracts: extracts of an ekhinatsea, mylnyanka, nettle two-blast furnace, camomiles, yarrow, St. John's wort, celandine, and oak bark. Impresses. But also here it is a lot of chemistry, it was not also without sulfates. But for shampoo of low price category it is very good structure, in my opinion. It would be just wrong to demand more. It is not really trusted words
"100% the natural washing components", extract of a mylnyanka appears, of course, but how sulfates?
Shampoo of green color, not really liquid, but not dense. Aroma usual for shampoos of "The clean line", a special difference between their smells I do not find. But it quite pleasant, fresh. On hair this aroma keeps long, sometimes before the following washing.
Foams perfectly, washes away hair from the first. It is spent economically.
But now about the main thing. Why it so was not pleasant to me? I usually do not go to the village with the shampoos and shower gels – why with itself to carry excess bottles? Here also I used this shampoo. And next day after application for me dandruff developed. Other reasons for emergence of this problem were not. And in general dandruff at me years ten definitely did not appear. Instead of promised
"thick, volume and brilliant hair after the first application"I have "snow" on the head. Now also it is necessary to fight against this trouble. Dandruff began also at the father so hardly it just coincidence. Perhaps it depends on features of head skin, I do not know. But more I do not use this shampoo, this time with the arrived. Other members of the family of complaints to shampoo do not show. But instead of volume mother every time receives "explosion in macaroni factory" - hair strongly are fluffy. But gloss really is. Though it pleases.
Whether you used such shampoo? What your attitude towards him?
