- natural structure (it is as much as possible vegetable ingredients);
- restores structure of hair and protects from negative factors of the environment;
- after it hair easily comb hair;
- hair remain clean as long as possible.
It seems, with requirements all. Perhaps of course, I want too much from such habitual means how shampoo? I do not know …
Not without recommendations and responses maycharmelek I found though not ideal, but nevertheless quite good (I would even tell, good) shampoo. I present to your attention sea-buckthorn shampoo of Natura Siberica producer. For hair from the Oblepikha Siberica Professional series there are still a mask and a srub, but I did not use them yet. This shampoo - the first means of this producer which I ever used.
That always attracted me in means from Natura Siberica - it is design of packings. The bottles and so bright tubes which are unusually issued. And attract to themselves. And here the price of them to me always seemed high. Having thought of purchase of this shampoo, I decided that 200 rubles for 400 ml – only nothing. Especially at shampoo such impressive structure.
Let's consider the label closer.
"Food and restoration" - just what is necessary for my hair. In 2012 on final I mocked at the hair – made chemistry. Before treated them not really kindly: constantly "baked" them the iron and the hair dryer. Naturally, my hair after all procedures were not in the best state. Several times in large quantities cut off them, but for restoration used only purchased masks, and that not always. Further – pregnancy, feeding – and all vitamins of wons from me. Hair became even worse. Undertook restoration only thanks to the website Maycharm: began to use regularly oils, in particular, almond. But restoration them goes still: my oily hair at roots and very dry on tips. Incurred me, we will return to shampoo. At me are laid great hopes on it in complex care behind hair.
It is specified that shampoo has effect of lamination. My hair constantly curl and fluffy. Perhaps, shampoo will cope also with it.
The description of shampoo completely approaches under my requirements. One more important fact – in shampoos is not present sulfates and parabens. That's it the absence of SLS in structure also justifies shampoo cost, I consider!
We find a complete description of properties of shampoo on a reverse side of a bottle.
"Is suitable for hair after a chemical wave"- where you were earlier, my savior?
Method of application of shampoo same, as at the most usual.
We pay attention to structure: in it even nine (!) ingredients of plant origin! And all high on the list! Among them and oil of the Alpine sea-buckthorn which is recognized by the producer the most useful among all species of a sea-buckthorn. In my opinion, shampoo contains nothing dangerous.
Our producer – Russian, shampoo is made in accordance with GOST.
At a bottle very convenient cover. To open, it is necessary to press it. Through a small hole shampoo is very easily dosed in that quantity what is required.
Shampoo quite dense. Color is sea-buckthorn, compare:
And the aroma, of course, too has similarity to sea-buckthorn. However, when drawing on hair the smell changes a little, it becomes more silent. Hair after washing do not lose this aroma even next day. This smell very much is pleasant to me.
Shampoo just remarkably, despite the absence of SLS in structure foams. It is spent economically.
Shampoo perfectly washes out hair, does them soft. Hair really comb hair easily, as well as the producer promised. It means, we save on the conditioner.
About a hair reconstruction, of course, to speak rather early – I use shampoo only a month. I can tell one – my hair like this means. Here and my hair. I wash hair in the evening, the picture is made the next morning. As you can see, tips of hair all the same still dry and weak.
Now about product minuses.
1. Hair gryaznitsya quicker, than after shampoo with sulfates. If with usual shampoo I wash hair each three days, then after this shampoo hair grease already by the end of the second day. Perhaps, hair need longer time on accustoming to such shampoo.
2. The effect of lamination is not so noticeable. Hair become more obedient, but tips do not cease to curl.
Drawing from everything conclusions, I want to tell that shampoo is not so bad. The main plus for me is structure. I do not know, I will buy this shampoo still or I will continue search of that shampoo. I think, I will specify it closer to a bottle bottom.
Thanks for attention!
