But if I bought it – I about it will write. Though, at first sight, it seems: what can be written about means for a shower? Already all is written long ago! Both about sulfates, and about aromas, and about all all. But after all I tried to find something new in this means.
I will begin with the fact that its name – shower foam, that is "foam for a shower".
In what difference of foam for a shower from shower gel?
It is clear from the name that the first means gives more foam. Foam for a shower more concentrated on consistence, more dense. On a photo it is visible that foam not especially pours out, that is is more dense, than usual gels. Also has more cream basis.
All this allows to use economically this means for a shower. That is, rather small amount of the size of a big coin for this purpose that on a bast dense, resistant foam was formed. Here such quantity can quietly be enough for you.
For a photo I did not use a bast, and made foam this product directly in a hand (very few water was required). Also it is visible that means keeps the cream basis, and quite plentiful foam even without bast and without massaging appears.
Synthetic structure
I fondly thought that if the product is created in the territory of the European Union, then in it there will be less vrednost and in general, the structure will differ from domestic goods to the best. But I was mistaken. Did not find any ingredient which could distinguish somehow this foam for a shower from very large number of available means for a shower.You watch structure:
There are glycols, salts, certainly sulfate, alcohol. Chloride of magnesium and nitrate of magnesium can cause strong skin reactions (chloride of magnesium has the healing property, but has a heap of side effects) – it is desirable to avoid them in means for body skin if there are skin reactions. And it is good to wash out skin after such means that these substances did not remain on skin. And though parabens otsustvut, the chosen preservatives are not considered as completely safe, can cause skin reaction.
And by the way, where green tea? It turns out, it only the name of perfumery composition. Really, such toilet water is available for a brand, and its smell is very similar to well-known "Green Tea" from Elisabeth Arden. But there is no extract of green tea neither in a deodorant, nor in a penalty fee for a shower. Offensively. Means, from the calming components only magnesium chloride.
Generally, the European producer disappointed me. It turns out that a massmarket – it and in Africa the massmarket, nothing to cry from it for the moon!
But all the rest is on the ball
And about good. A bottle of 250 ml, like big on volume, but small and compact by the size. Here it on a photo together with a deodorant with a capacity of 150 ml, and these weighty 250 ml are not even felt.
Good is chosen a form – such puzatenky small bottle from opaque snow-white plastic. Really small and convenient. Steady, does not fall.
The cover opens cool and closed, unlike a set of cheap means for a shower which do not bother this factor.
The fragrant composition is made with skill. I already wrote that the brand specializes in creation of available perfume. Green tea is not especially felt, there are more citrus notes and chords of fresh green leaves. Generally, differs from my idea of aroma of green tea (I drink it constantly, and only the grade with a melissa, perhaps, bears a faint resemblance to aroma of this means for a shower). But the main thing – aroma resistant. It keeps on skin long, hours 5 precisely. And in a complex with a deodorant great refreshes body skin, creates excellent feelings. All this gives to confidence, and the whole day it is possible to enjoy the invigorating notes which proceed from a body.
What I want to tell at the end. Is able to do aromas of Malizia. Such smell did not occur among domestic means to me yet: delicate and with noble sourness. Perhaps, in it distinctive feature of means of this Italian brand. Packings at this European brand too good and qualitative. But the structure surprised with nothing. I just like this series externally and on aroma, and for the rest – a typical budgetary fund. Not bad, but not some extraordinary.
