The plastic bottle contains in itself 200 milliliters of micellar water. The cover is turned off. The batcher is a small opening in the top part of a bottle, the spray is not provided.
The producer says that means is tested on allergenicity, suits any types of skin including sensitive, does not contain dyes and parabens.
Let's glance in structure? Parabens there, really, no, as well as sulfates. As surfactant it is used dinatrium kokoamfodiatsetat, acting softly and carefully.
There are also components of natural origin. For example, extracts of flowers of a honeysuckle fragrant and Japanese, possessing the fine toning and anti-inflammatory action, solves a set of problems of skin, beginning from an acne, finishing with vascular "asterisks".
Extract of seeds of sunflower softens, moisturizes and feeds the skin, regulates water and lipidic exchange.
Extract of seeds of a sage of Spanish supplies skin with polysaturated acids, will calm, will make skin silky.
Extract of fruits of a soap tree and extract of seeds of a mylnyanka medicinal carefully purifies skin, preserving it against a peresushivaniye, effectively soften skin. Their presence allow to use means even in case of sensitive skin: they will delicately act.
Not really I liked availability of hexyleneglycol which can quite irritate the skin and is komedogenny substance.
But in general everything is not so terrible. Frankly speaking, it surprised me: earlier Avon cosmetics did not differ in especially natural structure. Probably, too do not stand still.
I do not know for what reason, but on a reverse side of packing there is only a structure, well and any standards are specified there.
Very much, in my opinion, inconveniently! Here it is specified that a means expiration date – three years (date of production costs on a bottom), and there is no period of storage after opening of a bottle at all. Too minus.
Appearance of means (now I will surprise nobody) – one in one water: transparent, liquid, colourless. If did not begin to smell! Quite strong smell something synthetic. Br-r-r as it is not pleasant to me! It is good still that it quickly enough disappears. Despite availability of surfactant and extract of a soap root, water not sticky and not soapy.
It is simple to use water. I moisten with a mitsellyarka a wadded disk, I apply means to skin (I wash away only ink, a pencil and shadows) and I wait for several seconds.
Then to a wire a wadded disk and – all! The make-up remains on a disk, eyelashes and eyelids clean. If gets into eyes – burns down unmercifully therefore it is necessary to be very careful.
The producer assures that means can be not washed away from skin. I hold other opinion. First, the structure is natural not for hundred percent, secondly, surfactant even if it soft and sparing, after all surfactant, and is better to get rid of it. Thirdly, I have no feeling of an umytost, pure leather without water. For this reason I wash with use of cream (I already told about it).
So, I will sum up the result. Mitsellyarka perfectly copes with shadows, ink, a pencil for an eyeliner. The daughter with ease removes foundation, VV-cream, a concealer with its help, is ruddy. By the way, several times it took means with itself: removed a make-up after the performance. Told, skin was clean after the procedure. Lipstick was not tried to be purified: we do not use a superrack, and with usual and the napkin perfectly copes. Plus something is not pleasant to apply me a thought a mitsellyarka on lips.
As you can see, in general means quite good, but … The chemical smell for me crossed out all pluses therefore I will not begin to order this means
