At first sight
Here I do not love bright colors at cosmetics, and all here! I do not know even why. For this reason I was looked at purchase of the daughter skeptically. On the other hand – what to be upset? Soap is already bought, besides, costs not much (about 60 rubles for 500 g) – it is necessary to use.
So, appearance. A usual bottle with the batcher – anything remarkable, except, unless beautiful picture on it. The batcher is quite easy to use.
Gel of bright blue color, nacreous, with a pleasant perfumery smell (by the way, and close smells of nothing sea!).
Means is quite liquid, having got into a palm, aims to flow down from it therefore the procedure of a washing takes place quickly enough: poured, soaped, washed away. Here to you not to a vitaniye in clouds!
Look of the second, closer
Wishing to understand that is this means, naturally, we address structure.
How many I did not peer, did not find any sea minerals among components. From useful found only castor oil and something from almonds (it is for some reason not designated that it is oil, an extract or something other).
All the rest – alas, is not so useful – lauretsulfat sodium, a fragrance, preservatives and dyes. And what I would like for such cost?
Testing of means, or in private
As I already mentioned above, soap quite liquid. It Razmylivatsya not very well, almost bezpenno. More precisely, one dose of the money earned from the batcher is not enough additive normally is required to soap hands.
Only in that case the procedure of a washing will be satisfactory – there will be a feeling of rather clean hands. Do you ask why relatively? Alas, soap does not cope with some types of pollution: in particular, powerlessly before fat and oils, traces from vegetables. For example, I did beet salad, so it was necessary to wash hands several times, and that "flush" on palms and fingers remained. It was necessary to take firm "Velvety" - it coped with a task quickly and effectively. The same was also after cleaning of potatoes (I know, I know that it needs to be done in gloves!) – total disappearance of dark stains from hands required other soap.
Soap quickly is washed away, on skin after a washing it is not felt.
I cannot unambiguously tell that Bodyart dries skin. In my opinion, if it also takes place to be – passes imperceptibly. But it also does not humidify therefore unambiguously after the carried-out water procedures putting cream or hand lotion is required.
Let's sum up the result
So, we have inexpensive soap. It is beautiful, smells pleasantly. But also only! The washing ability, alas, leaves much to be desired. It is spent quickly, about moistening of skin of hands the speech does not go, the structure is doubtful too. Proceeding from it, I say to liquid soap for Bodyart hands Sea minerals my firm "no" and "I hardly pull" "three". I hope, you understood that I do not advise it to you?
