I as a supporter of organic cosmetics, I try to approach the choice of the cleaning means very scrupulously. Micellar water for removal of a make-up of Hydrolat Micellar Water from DNC meets my expectations almost completely.
The bottle with this cleaning means upon purchase was packed into a cardboard box with all necessary information on means. First of all I pay attention to structure, and then to promises of the producer.
As a part of this means, naturally, water, further there is hydroarmour – a camomile and a ginseng, kokomidopropit a betaine though is a synthetic component, but it is pretty sparing surfactant, hyaluronic acid – the known humidifier and preservative – sharomiks MTI which can be toxic. Yes, structure not the most organic, but in comparison with many other mitsellyarka which came across to me when choosing, this means the most harmless on structure.
Bottle volume with water of 170 ml, not really large volume, it is necessary to tell, and such means is spent quickly. The bottle transparent, is issued laconically, in style of all brand. Information on a bottle completely duplicates info on a box. The cover at a bottle leaning back, opens easily, without injury of nails and application of efforts, is closed before click. The opening for an exit of means of the most optimum diameter is, more, than it is necessary will not pour out and efforts on "production" of means can be not made too.
Water transparent, when stirring foams slightly, the smell has unostentatious if to smell is direct from a bottle, the aroma of hydrolats is felt, but when drawing means on a wadded disk, the smell instantly disappears.
What is promised to us by the producer of this means?
That this water removes a make-up in only a few minutes and will make it gently, without irritating the skin around eyes, refreshes and humidifies, thanks to hyaluronic acid content. Still the producer claims that this means can replace washing. What personally I doubt. I consider that no mitsellyarka, a milk can replace full washing and that there still exists. Therefore after application of all these means surely I wash, but not with soap, of course, and I apply hydrophilic oil, either a skin, or gel, depends on a season. But that's another story, we will return to use of micellar water from DNC.
Existence of hydrolats in this means does clarification, really, sparing. The camomile hydrolat easily calms skin, protects it and strengthens restoration processes. The ginseng hydrolat, in turn, has antioxidant and antistress properties, tones up, contains the richest complex micro and macrocells for skin food.
Therefore removal of a make-up with this means for me turns into pleasure. I moisten with hydrolat two wadded disks at once, I put to eyes and I wait for half-minute. Then easy movements I remove a make-up. For economy) I apply both parties of wadded disks. Therefore the second couple of disks already almost control). Everything cleans up for once. Then I am passed on growth of eyelashes by a Q-tip to remove the remains of an eyeliner and ink. About any irritation of eyes or a veil the speech does not even go. The make-up is removed on "hurrah" without irritating at the same time a century or mucous at accidental hit of means on it.
The promise of the producer to remove a make-up in only a few minutes completely is kept! As well as the second point – tenderness to skin around eyes. Skin moistening is too, tells lack of tightness after application of means about it. Well, and as means contains synthetic components in structure – surfactant, this clarification needs to be finished washing.
Whether it was pleasant to me it is micellar water? Yes! In spite of the fact that in it half synthetic structure.
I recommend for application, and itself, most likely, I will get again.
