So I became the owner of a tuba of 30 ml of the Cleaning Fresh Moistening Gel (Hydra Vegetal Refreshing Gel Cleanser).

Packing of gel is pleasant to an eye: the tuba is bluish and transparent, through its walls, it is visible that means is penetrated by vials of air (by the way, it is a pleasure to watch them).

In structure there are pantenol (the proved means in care of skin), familiar to me on body gels a witch-hazel and extract of a sugar maple to what I was surprised as I did not know its purpose in means for washing. It appears, at this component there are a lot of advantages: it regulates activity of sebaceous glands, restores cellular updating, promotes regeneration. However, judging from the fact that this ingredient costs closer to end of the list, especially it is not necessary to rely on it.

Gel of average density, does not flow when you apply it. On structure plotnovat, it is colourless, aroma gentle, pleasant and recognizable – all means with a witch-hazel so smell.

It is quite interesting to use it: when you apply it to skin, it covers it dense (and such feeling that thick) with a layer though it was taken literally a droplet. At first I during washing even mistrustfully touched skin and was surprised about myself – from where such feeling of density.

After gel contacts with water, it foams. Foam not plentiful, but very effective: washes away skin pollution well.
Means without special difficulties is washed away, there is no feeling of a film on a face.
After washing you feel purity of skin and freshness.
And moistening? – you ask. Here I can tell nothing good because it is absent. Absolutely, because even I, the owner of oily skin, feel dryness and tightness. Yes, at once after washing there is a wish to apply as soon as possible face cream so about any moistening out of the question.
Probably, it will be interesting to much how means copes with a make-up. In pictures I will show you result of washing off of ink, a pencil for an eyeliner and eye shadow.
So, the "painted" hand – ink, a pencil, shadows.

We apply gel. Do you see how it covers skin?

We moisten skin with water and it is carefully massed (strongly it is not necessary to rub) then we wash away. There is enough single soaping that skin became clean.

However, I seldom wash away cosmetics gel (recently conceived a liking for a milk), but, nevertheless, it to me does not prevent to estimate the high washing ability of means. I think, those who like to make makeup removal with the help "umyvalok" will estimate this moment.
Thanks to dense texture, gel very economically is spent: the small tuba of 30 ml to me will last for a long time though I use means within a week, in its tuba still is available enough.
Now about gel cost. On the website Yves Rocher without discounts costs it 460 rubles for 125 ml. Personally it seems to me that for "umyvalka" even if not the worst, it is unfairly expensive. Plus dries gel also leather … Though, on the other hand, it will last for a long time. In a word, it is worth reflecting and weighing all pro and against".
What to tell as a result? Many thanks Yves Rocher that gave me the chance free of charge to test the mini-version of the Cleaning Fresh Moistening Gel. For myself I decided that I will not begin to order the full version yet – I will use other cosmetics, the benefit their choice is huge now.
Or perhaps in vain I do not provide to gel chance? How do you consider?