How to define that means suits you, according to the recommendation of the producer?
- If you the owner of the normal or mixed skin.
I have a skin type combined (a fat T-zone and sometimes dry cheeks).
- If you need not fat and qualitative means.
I do not love when means leaves fat marks then it is necessary to wash, using additional resources for clarification of skin around eyes, and not all means for face cleansing can boast of it. - If means is necessary for you for clarification of a waterproof make-up.
Yes, this most necessary. Lotion of Garnier coped with it perfectly.
According to the description of the producer, action of a milk of Garnier is based that it effectively eliminates pollution from leather (fat, dust, cosmetics) at the expense of the formula with addition of extract of grapes which is known as the fighter against toxins. The texture of a milk easy, does not leave a film on skin.
The milk needs to be applied on a wadded disk and to accurately remove a make-up.
What is a part of means? Yes what does not enter only there! One continuous chemistry. Even there is no wish to sort. Some sulfates counted six pieces. There is also a paraben. And how about grapes extract? Yes, it is, but on the penultimate place, that is it as a part of mix absolutely small quantity with which hardly it will be able to cause advantage to our skin.
Packing of means.
Small plastic bottle of light green color. It is closed by a small white lid before click. Opens with little effort, at the same time in closed form the means leakage is excluded.
Milk of white color with a chemical smell, liquid.
If I use this milk not in the bathroom, and in the bedroom, sitting at a dressing table, then after application it is necessary just to run to the bathroom to wash. And how here to run? Pinches eyes, nothing is visible because of a film! It is necessary only to hope for memory and to go to the touch, hoping that anything and nobody will be hit in way.
Now I will try to show a milk in operation. Only I do not want to use it in eyes, it is painful to me it was not pleasant. I will show on a hand. Maj has some ink a hand, for this purpose I use:
1. Waterproof ink 2000 Calorie Waterproof from Max Factor (on a photo on the right);
2. The High Lengths Mascara mascara from Clinique (on a photo at the left).
The first I try to wash away Clinique. I put for about 10 seconds a wadded disk with a milk, later with small effort I take a disk in the made-up place.
Did not take. Further I take several times a wadded disk in the made-up place, making effort. Ink managed to be erased.
Further too most I take with waterproof ink of Max Factor. As you can see on a photo, on a hand I have hair, I partially smeared them with ink that the experiment was brought closer to the correct use. I put a wadded disk with a milk for about 30 seconds. Longer, as ink waterproof.
Ink remained on the place. Only slightly cotton wool became black. Further diligently I wipe a hand with a milk, I use the efforts. Process lasts long enough, and at last ink gives in. But on a hand there is a red spot. If I so rubbed eyes, I could not print the review now!
The milk softened skin, but is long felt on skin in a look to a film. Skin smells of that chemical aroma. It does not suit me, there is a wish to rinse with water.
Result. Means was not pleasant to me at all. It did not equal my hopes. Costs at me in a locker now and waits... I what it waits for do not know? Likely, when I will throw out it. It is a pity. Already thought, to give it to someone from acquaintances.
Philosophy Garnier Skin Nechrals:
1. Use of natural components.
It, of course, is good. But whether it was impossible to add these natural components to a product more?
2. The products are checked under dermatological control.
Let's hope that it is not mere words.
3. Products with the proved efficiency.
Who proved it? I will not rise in defense of efficiency of means.
