Recently told about hand cream from Yves Rocher who me very much was pleasant (www.wowcharm.us/kosmetika/obzory/ultrapitatelnyj-krem-dlya-ruk-na-zashhite-kozhi/). In the review I wrote that I chose then the second tube in boutique, but …
"But" also the review today's is devoted to this. The matter is that, kind of I fixedly did not peer into packing, I managed to make a booboo: instead of Ultrapitelny cream I bought Hand cream 2 in 1 for appearance of hands and nails from Yves Rocher.
However, especially packings you should not be surprised: both means are similar as twin brothers – the same drawing, the name of a series (Beaute des Mains) and registration in general. Not only that I did not take with myself that tube to choose the same, still managed also the name to forget … In a word, crow.
I guessed "setup" not at once. Brought cream home and began to use. The first that surprised me – aroma. It was absolutely another: heavy flower, quite sharp, long not disappearing. To me then to verify tubes (Ultranutritious cream temporarily "lived" at work), but I thought that the producer, most likely, changed a fragrance (agree, it quite often happens).
Then I was guarded by color and consistence: cream white, but with a clear pinkish shade, leaky, slightly watery. Here already I sinned for memory supposedly perhaps, and that was the same, just badly I remember.
I suspected wrong only in about three days when I understood that new cream at all not the fact that old. And all because it badly carried out "duties". No, it was absorbed quickly enough, but here with moistening there were problems: skin did not feel it. From a word absolutely., It seems, something was smeared, but … There was a wish to add a portion of cream right there. The brush back especially suffered from dryness (this my most problem place).
The amount of cream had to be increased, however it helped a little: continued to dry skin, though it is a little less. Other problem places – a cuticle and okolonogtevy rollers - means did not affect at all: skin remained coarsened. After a long break hangnails got again – and here only then I sounded the alarm (yes, I know that it needed to be made much earlier).
From work cream was urgently brought, appearances and passwords are verified. And – they are da ladies! – it became clear that by own carelessness I bought other cream! Absolutely foolish situation when you do not know to laugh or cry. Of course, I preferred to laugh and draw the corresponding conclusions: from now on to be more attentive.
So, this Cream 2 in 1 differs from Ultranutritious cream on consistence, color, aroma and action. Well, and on structure, of course. Though in general structures are similar.
For example, there is an arnica extract - protecting, moisturizing and bleaching a component.
Rape oil – the wonderful defender of skin from ultraviolet rays, air pollutions, detergents is a part of ingredients. Besides, it is vitamin-rich, such as A, E, C, Century.
Extract of the Damask rose – possesses the rejuvenating, healing and moistening action. In structure this component is practically in the end, so it a little, but, nevertheless, it is available.
The vitamin E prolonging skin youth.
Actually, from components, useful to skin, perhaps, all. The rest – a usual set of stabilizers, solvents, preservatives, fragrances and other.
As I already wrote above, cream I remained is dissatisfied. Some time I in general used it and already even thought to throw out (though, frankly speaking, it was a pity for money that I paid for it). But here once the daughter used it: she has yet no problems with skin of hands therefore means has more or less moistening effect (but the smell was not pleasant to it too). I look, cream began to be spent. It is good that at it after opening an expiration date of 12 months, so we will manage to smear it.
Yes, nearly forgot! Cream was bought by me for 250 rubles at a discount, without discount it costs 310 rubles. Very expensively for 75 ml of effectless means, I consider! Unambiguously to find something else better.
